SKEPTICISM
Philosophy 137
Spring 1998
Professor Amy Kind
Office Hours:
akind@benson.mckenna.edu
Monday 4:00-5:00 p.m.
Seaman 223; x73782
Tuesday 2:30-4:00 p.m.
http://phil-rlst.mckenna.edu/akind
Wednesday 10:30-11:30 a.m.
or by appointment
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Consider the following hypothesis:
though it seems to you that you have a body – head, arms, legs and so on
– and though it seems to you that you are sitting in a chair right now
with a piece of paper in front of you, in fact you are simply a brain,
suspended in a vat full of liquid and connected by a complex wiring system
to an enormously powerful computer. Some extraordinarily clever but
also extraordinarily malevolent scientists have programmed the computer
to feed you all of your experiences, that is, to make it seem to you that
you have a body, that you are sitting in a chair, and all the rest.
Once this hypothesis is presented,
a very natural question arises: How do you know that the hypothesis
is false, that is, how do you know that you are not a brain in a vat?
It is this question, and related skeptical questions, that will occupy
us in this course. Our investigation of skepticism will take place
in the context of a general investigation of epistemology – the
study of knowledge. The skeptic argues that knowledge is impossible,
but in order to understand this skeptcial conclusion, and the arguments
for it, we will have to take up two of the most basic epistemological questions,
namely, "What is knowledge?" and "What is justification?"
In the first half of this course, we will study philosophers’ attempts
to answer these questions; then, in the second half of this course we will
look more directly at several arguments for skepticism and several attempts
to answer the skeptic.
COURSE TEXTS
There are two textbooks for this course, available for purchase in Huntley Bookstore:
Each of these textbooks is also available on two-hour reserve at Honnold Library. Also available on two-hour reserve is A Companion to Epistemology, Jonathan Dancy (ed.), which may be useful to you as a reference text.
Additional readings will be made available in class.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Papers. You will have to write four papers; each will be approximately 4-6 pages in length. Topics will be distributed in class approximately one week before the due date.
Paper #1 due: Thursday 2/19 by 1 p.m. (15% of course grade)
Paper #2 due: Thursday 3/12 by 1 p.m. (25% of course grade)
Paper #3 due: Thurdsay 4/16 by 1 p.m. (25% of course grade)
Paper #4 due: Thursday 5/14 by 1 p.m. (25% of course grade)
Rewrite policy (for the first three papers). Writing philosophy is difficult, and very different from writing in other disciplines. Thus, I will allow you to rewrite any paper turned in on time which gets a B- or lower. Rewrites are entirely optional. If you choose to rewrite a paper, the rewrite should be submitted along with a photocopy of the original paper, and must be turned in to me no later than one week after the original papers were initially returned in class. Your grade on the paper will then be an average of the original grade and the rewrite grade. (Note: this rewrite policy applies to the first three papers only. Since the fourth paper is due during finals week, it cannot be rewritten.)
Class participation. 10% of your course grade will
come from class participation. Attendance in class is required.
However, it is not enough merely to attend; you must also take an active
part in our discussion. On this front, you are expected to come to
class having read and thought carefully about the assigned readings.
You should aim to contribute a thoughtful comment or question to our class
discussions at least once a week or, alternatively, you should aim to post
a thoughtful comment or question to our Web-discussion group at least once
a week. Further details about the Web-discussion group will be distributed
in class.
READING SCHEDULE
All reading assignments are to be completed by the date listed.
Readings marked (GS) can be found in Goodman and Snyder; readings marked
(CR) can be found in the course reader.
DATE | TOPIC | READING |
W 1/21 | Introduction: What is Skepticism? | (none) |
M 1/26 | Dancy, Ch. 1 handout: "Making Sense of Logical Notation" |
|
W 1/28 | The Traditional Account of Knowledge and the Gettier Problem | Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge"
(GS) Dancy, 2.1 - 2.2 |
M 2/2 | Responses to Gettier | Goldman, "A Causal Theory of Knowing" (GS) |
W 2/4 | Lehrer, "The Gettier Problem and the Analysis of Knowledge" (GS) | |
M 2/9 | Nozick, "Knowledge" (GS) | |
W 2/11 | Dancy, 3.1 - 3.2 | |
M 2/16 - W 2/18 | Theories of Justification: Foundationalism | Dancy, Ch. 4 Chisholm, "One Version of Foundationalism" (GS) |
M 2/23 - W 2/25 | Theories of Justification: Coherentism | Bonjour, "The Coherence Theory of Empirical
Knowledge" (GS) Dancy, Ch. 8 and 9 |
M 3/2 - W 3/4 | Theories of Justification: Reliabilism | Goldman, "What is Justified Belief?" (GS) |
M 3/9 - W 3/11 | Theories of Justification: Contextualism | Annis, "A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification" (GS) |
SPRING BREAK | ||
M 3/23 - W 3/25 | Skeptical Arguments | Descartes, Meditation One (handout) |
M 3/30 - W 4/1 | Stroud, Ch. 1 (handout) | |
M 4/6 - W 4/8 | Lehrer, "Why Not Scepticism?"(GS) | |
M 4/13 - W 4/15 | Unger, "An Argument for Skepticism"(GS) | |
M 4/20 - W 4/22 | Responses to the Skeptic | Nozick, "Skepticism" (GS) |
M 4/27 - W 4/29 | Moore, "Certainty" (GS) | |
M 5/4 - W 5/6 | Malcolm, "Knowledge and Belief" (GS) |