|
M: Bobby is an attorney |
R: Lindsay is ethical |
U:
the firm wins the case |
|
P: Lindsay is an attorney |
S: Bobby is scheming |
W:
the motion is denied |
|
Q: Bobby is ethical |
T: Lindsay is scheming |
1. Despite the fact that Bobby is scheming he is ethical.
2. The motion is denied and the firm loses the case if Lindsay fails to be scheming.
3. The firm wins the case unless Lindsay, a scheming attorney, is unethical.
4. Unlike Bobby, Lindsay is not a scheming attorney.
5. Given that Bobby is scheming if Lindsay is scheming, the firm wins the case as long as the motion is not denied.
6. Neither Lindsay nor Bobby, both of whom are attorneys, is either scheming or unethical.
7. Lindsay’s being scheming ensures that Bobby is scheming too.
8. Only if neither Bobby nor Lindsay is scheming are they ethical, assuming that they are both attorneys.
9. The firm wins the case provided that Bobby or Lindsay is scheming or unethical.
10. If and only if the motion is not denied will the firm win the case.
11. Lindsay is scheming if Bobby is scheming, but his being unethical is not a sufficient condition for her being unethical.
12. Though neither Bobby nor Lindsay is unethical, the firm will win the case assuming that at least one of them is scheming.