US Congress
CMC Gov 101, Spring 2016
Monday and Wednesday 11AM-12:15 PM
Classroom:
Roberts South 102
J.J. Pitney -- Office:
232 Kravis
Telephone: 909/607-4224
Office
Hours: Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thu 1-2 PM.
If
these times are inconvenient, please
make an appointment
Email:
jpitney@cmc.edu
General
Like a vast picture
thronged with figures of equal prominence and crowded with elaborate
and obtrusive details, Congress is hard to see satisfactorily and
appreciatively at a single view and from a single stand-point. Its complicated forms and
diversified structure confuse the vision, and conceal the system which
underlies its composition. It
is too complex to be understood without effort, without a careful and
systematic process of analysis.
-- Woodrow Wilson, Congressional
Government
In this course, we shall
undertake such analysis. We
shall ask how lawmakers behave at home and on Capitol Hill. We shall study Congress's
procedures and structures, with an eye to explaining why some bills
pass while others languish.
Classes
Class sessions will include
lecture and discussion. Finish
each week's readings before class because our discussions will involve
those readings. We
shall also talk about breaking news stories about Congress, so you must read a good daily news source such
as
Politico
or
Real
Clear Politics.
Blog
Our
class blog is at
http://gov101.blogspot.com.
I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material
there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you
may review the rest at your convenience. You will
all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me
know if you do not get such an
invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
-
To
post questions or comments about the readings before we
discuss them in class;
-
To
follow up on class discussions with additional
comments or questions.
-
To
post relevant news items or videos.
Grades
The following will make up
your course grade:
- One four page paper: 20%
- One six-page paper: 25%
- Simulation and writeup: 25%
- One three-page paper: 15%
- Participation and blog: 15%
Details
- The papers
will
develop your research and writing skills.
In grading your papers, I will take account of the
quality
of your writing, applying the principles of
Strunk and
White’s
Elements of Style. If
you object to this approach, do not take this course, or anything else
that I teach.
- The simulation
will require you to study your part and spend several sessions in
character. Do
not take this class if you cannot
take part in the simulation.
- Class
participation
will hone your ability to think on your feet, as I shall call on
students at random. If
you often miss class or fail to prepare, your grade will suffer. I shall use the cold calls to judge how
well you are keeping up with the material.
If
you object to this approach, do not take this course. I
also expect you to post relevant material to the blog.
- In addition to
the required readings (below), I may also give you handouts,
emails, and web links covering
current events and basic factual information.
- As a courtesy to your fellow students, please
arrive on
time, and refrain from eating in class.
- Check
due dates
for coursework. Arrange your schedule accordingly.
Do not plan on extensions.
Plagiarism or any other form of academic
dishonesty will result in referral to the Academic Standards Committee. See:
http://www.cmc.edu/writing/plagiarism.php Ponder what our registrar said at the end of last semester:
Just
in case you find yourself tempted to cut corners, remember that it’s
better to turn in your work late, or not to turn it in at all, than it
is to turn in something you’ve cheated on. Since the fall of
2012, we’ve seen an average of 19 academic dishonesty cases per year.
These cases resulted in dozens of failing grades, 16 suspensions, and 3
permanent dismissals for students who were found responsible.
Think
about what kind of student you want to be and the value of the degree
you’re working so hard to earn, and then act accordingly.
Required
Books (make sure that you get the right edition of each book
-
Louis Fisher, Constitutional
Conflicts Between Congress and the
President, 6th ed. (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press,
2014).
-
John Haskell, Marian Currinder, and Sara A Grove, Congress in Context, 2d ed. (Boulder: Westview, 2014).
- Paul S. Herrnson, Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 7th ed. (Washington: Sage/CQ, 2016).
-
John F. Kennedy, Profiles in Courage
(New York: HarperCollins, 2006 [1955]).
Schedule
The schedule is subject to change,
with advance notice.
Jan
20: Introduction
"Congress'
approval rating is probably even lower than the Ministry of Magic's
when Cornelius Fudge was running the show, so Jimmy
Kimmel set out to find out exactly what we all think of our
representatives. And by that, we mean he just wanted to see if anyone
could name one person in Congress. Yeah, just one. You can probably
guess where this is going. Not only could people not name their
representatives, but Kimmel's crew also convinced them fictional
characters were in office, including Ash Ketchum and Neville Longbottom. " -- Bill Bradley, Huffington Post.
What are the major
functions of Congress?
Jan 25, 27: Two Political Branches, Two Chambers, Two Congresses, Two Parties
"The Democrats are
the opposition; the real enemy is the Senate." -- Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX),
repeating an old saying.
Congress is both a lawmaking bodies and a
representative
assembly. It has two distinct chambers with majority and
minority parties. How do these dualities affect its work?
-
Haskell, ch. 1-2
-
Fisher,
ch. 1
FOUR-PAGE
ESSAY
ASSIGNED JAN 27, DUE IN SAKAI DROPBOX BY FRIDAY, FEBRUARY
12.
READ STRUNK AND WHITE FIRST.
Feb 1, 3: Leaders and Parties
"In
all bodies, those who will lead, must also, in a considerable degree,
follow. They must conform their propositions to the taste, talent, and
disposition, of those whom they wish to conduct: therefore, if an
assembly is viciously or feebly composed in a very great part of it,
nothing but such a supreme degree of virtue as very rarely appears in
the world, and for that reason cannot enter into calculation, will
prevent the men of talent disseminated through it from becoming only
the expert instruments of absurd projects!" --
Edmund
Burke
What
is the relationship of legislative leaders, parties, and the rank-and-file?
-
Haskell, ch. 3
- Herrnson, ch. 4
-
Rowland
Evans and Robert Novak, "The Johnson System," in The
Legislative Process in the US Senate, eds. Lawrence K. Pettit and
Edward Keynes (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969). In Sakai.
Feb 8, 10: Elections I
"So
why is compromise
so hard in the House? ... [The answer could be this instead: individual
members of Congress are responding fairly rationally to their
incentives. Most members of the House now come from hyperpartisan
districts where they face essentially no threat of losing their seat to
the other party. Instead, primary challenges, especially for
Republicans, may be the more serious risk." --
Nate Silver
How do members win election and reelection? Do
they present different faces at home and on the Hill?
Feb 15, 17: Elections II
"Are
you aware that Claude Pepper is known all over Washington as a
shameless extrovert? Not only that, but this man is reliably reported
to practice nepotism with his sister-in-law and he has a sister who was
once a thespian in wicked New York. Worst of all, it is an established
fact that Mr. Pepper, before his marriage, habitually practiced
celibacy.'' -- From a tall tale about an attack that Rep. George Smathers purportedly used against Sen. Claude Pepper in 1950
What strategies and tactics do congressional candidates use? How do campaigns and outside groups raise and spend money?
SIX-PAGE ESSAY
ASSIGNED FEBRUARY 15, DUE IN SAKAI DROPBOX BY FRIDAY, MARCH 4.
Feb 22, 24: Legislative Process
“If you let me write
procedure and I let you write substance, I'll screw you every time.” --
Rep. John Dingell (D-MI)
How
does the majority try to control the floor? How can the
minority overcome the majority's procedural advantage?
- Haskell, ch. 5-6
- Donald
R. Wolfensberger, "Changing House Rules: From Fair Game to Partisan
Tilt," presented at the Conference on Congress, the Constitution and
Contemporary Politics, American Enterprise Institute, October 16, 2015.
On Sakai
ONE-PAGE MEMO ON
SIMULATION ROLE DUE IN SAKAI DROPBOX BY MONDAY, MARCH 7
Feb 29, Mar 2: Power of the Purse
"In
phonemarking, a lawmaker calls an agency to request financing for a
project. More indirectly, members of Congress make use of what are
known as soft earmarks, which involve making suggestions about where
money should be directed, instead of explicitly instructing agencies to
finance a project. Members also push for increases in financing of
certain accounts in a federal agency’s budget and then forcefully
request that the agency spend the money on the members’ pet project." -- Ron Nixon, New York Times
How does the actual practice of appropriating and budgeting differ from the flowchart?
Haskell, ch. 7-8
- Fisher, ch. 7
Mar 7, 9: Oversight
"[House Oversight Chair Jason] Chaffetz, who is now entering
his fourth term in Congress, says he sought out [former chair Henry]
Waxman when he arrived in Washington in 2009. `I just proactively went
up and shook his hand and said I care about this and I admire what he’s
done,' Chaffetz says. `Although I disagree with him on just about
everything,' Chaffetz says, Waxman is “passionate about [Congress as
an] institution, the process by which you do oversight, and the
elements and keys to success.' `If you look at his effectiveness,
ouch,' Chaffetz says. `He took a bite out of the [Bush] administration
and, from that respect, I admire what he did.'" -- Eliana
Johnson
Is there a bright line between institutional oversight and partisan warfare?- Haskell, ch. 9-10
- Fisher, ch. 6
Mar 14, 16: Spring Break
Mar 21, 23: Congress and the Executive I
"I
just want to repeat, I'm president, I'm not king. If Congress has laws
on the books that says that people who are here who are not documented
have to be deported, then I can exercise some flexibility in terms of
where we deploy our resources, to focus on people who are really
causing problems as a opposed to families who are just trying to work
and support themselves. But there's a limit to the discretion that I
can show because I am obliged to execute the law. That's what the
Executive Branch means. I can't just make the laws up by myself. So the
most important thing that we can do is focus on changing the underlying
laws." --
President Obama, October 25, 2010.
How do the executive and
legislative branches check each other? Do they intrude on each other's
legitimate authority?
- Haskell, ch. 11
- Fisher, ch. 4
Apr 4, 6: Congress and the Executive II
"Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) was prepped for an appropriations
hearing on the defense budget when he took his turn
Wednesday afternoon, flipping papers on his lap, reading from them and
commending the witness for his department’s prompt response to a letter
Coats
had sent about a military accounting office in his home state. It was
all fairly innocuous except for one problem: Coats
was in the completely wrong hearing complimenting the wrong witness.
After he’d finished a lengthy opening to his question, a
staffer slipped Coats a piece of paper. Coats read it to himself,
looked up,
and said, “I just got a note saying I’m at the wrong hearing."
-- Washington
Post,
April 3, 2014.
Apr 11, 13: Congress and Others
"But,
let’s be honest. Not every bill we are asked to vote on will be perfect
and there will be times when the choices we face are less than ideal.
We are Members of Congress— that’s part of the job. Too many in our
Conference are falling into the pattern of voting no on tough bills
while actually hoping the bill passes because they know that the outcome will be even worse if the bill fails." -- House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA)
How
do members decide how to
vote? What is the impact of interest groups? What is the relationship of Congress and the judiciary?
- Haskell, ch. 12-14.
- Herrnson, ch. 10-11.
SIMULATION
WRITEUP DUE IN SAKAI DROPBOX BY FRIDAY, APRIL 15
Apr 18, 20: National Security
"Politics are changing and you don't want
to be the last one holding the dog collar when the oversight committee
comes." -- "Dan" (Jason Clarke) to "Maya" (Jessica Chastain) in
Zero Dark Thirty
Can Congress effectively
check the executive branch in wartime? Do lawmakers have the
expertise and information to make decisions about national and homeland
security?
THIRD PAPER ASSIGNED APRIL 18, DUE IN SAKAI
DROPBOX BY MAY 2.
Apr 25, 27: Reviewing Congressional History
I
"It quickly became clear that there
is nothing new or unusual about the pattern of sharp partisanship shown
in the past two presidential elections and in the frequent battles on
Capitol Hill. David Brady of Stanford University made the point that
the late 19th century and parts of the 20th century were also times of
party warfare; the anomaly was the relative truce for roughly 25 years
after World War II." --
David Broder
How
does today's Congress compare with that of the past? Have
lawmakers gotten better or worse?
May 2, 4: Reviewing Congressional
History II
"It
may take courage to battle one's president, one's party, or the
overwhelming sentiment of one's nation; but these do not compare, it
seems to me, to the courage required of the Senate defying the angry
power of the very constituents who control his future." --
John F. Kennedy
How
had divided government worked since the Second World War? Why
has polarization waxed and waned?
##
Return
to homepage